2009

Measuring Invariances in Deep Networks

I. Goodfellow, Quoc Le, A. Saxe, A. Ng

citations

Cite Score

25

AI summary

This paper introduces a suite of "invariance tests" to directly measure the invariance properties of features learned by deep learning algorithms, finding that stacked autoencoders show modest improvements with depth, while convolutional deep belief networks learn substantially more invariant features, providing insights into feature learning and evaluation.

Main Contributions

  • Proposed a suite of empirical invariance tests to directly measure the degree to which learned features in deep networks are invariant to different input transformations.
  • Showed that stacked autoencoders learn modestly increasingly invariant features with depth when trained on natural images.
  • Demonstrated that convolutional deep belief networks (CDBNs) learn substantially more invariant features in each layer, justifying the use of deeper representations.
  • Observed that mechanisms beyond simple stacking of autoencoders may be important for achieving invariance.
  • Introduced evaluation metrics applicable to future work in deep learning to aid algorithm development.

Abstract

For many pattern recognition tasks, the ideal input feature would be invariant to multiple confounding properties (such as illumination and viewing angle, in computer vision applications). Recently, deep architectures trained in an unsupervised manner have been proposed as an automatic method for extracting useful features. However, it is difficult to evaluate the learned features by any means other than using them in a classifier. In this paper, we propose a number of empirical tests that directly measure the degree to which these learned features are invariant to different input transformations. We find that stacked autoencoders learn modestly increasingly invariant features with depth when trained on natural images. We find that convolutional deep belief networks learn substantially more invariant features in each layer. These results further justify the use of “deep” vs. “shallower” representations, but suggest that mechanisms beyond merely stacking one autoencoder on top of another may be important for achieving invariance. Our evaluation metrics can also be used to evaluate future work in deep learning, and thus help the development of future algorithms.

Citation Graph

Loading graph...

References [22]

Sort:
Filter:

D. E. Rumelhart, Geoffrey E. Hinton, Ronald J. Williams - 1986

34 papers in library cite

Geoffrey E. Hinton, S. Osindero, Y. Teh - 2006

43 papers in library cite

Yann Lecun, B. Boser, John S. Denker, D. Henderson, R. E. Howard, W. Hubbard, L. D. Jackal - 1989

24 papers in library cite

Yoshua Bengio, P. Lamblin, D. Popovici, Hugo Larochelle - 2006

33 papers in library cite

Li Fei Fei, Rob Fergus, Pietro Perona - 2004

15 papers in library cite

Rajat Raina, Alexis Battle, Honglak Lee, Benjamin Packer, A. Ng - 2007

7 papers in library cite

Yoshua Bengio, Yann Lecun - 2007

15 papers in library cite

Yann Lecun, Fu Jie Huang, Leon Bottou - 2004

18 papers in library cite

Marc'aurelio Ranzato, F. Huang, Y. Boureau, Yann Lecun - 2007

8 papers in library cite

Hugo Larochelle, Dumitru Erhan, Aaron Courville, James Bergstra, Yoshua Bengio - 2007

13 papers in library cite

P. Werbos - 1974

14 papers in library cite

Honglak Lee, R. Grosse, R. Ranganath, Andrew Y. Ng - 2009

12 papers in library cite

Marc'aurelio Ranzato, Y. Boureau, Yann Lecun - 2008

12 papers in library cite

Honglak Lee, C. Ekanadham, A. Ng - 2008

10 papers in library cite

M. Riesenhuber, T. Poggio - 1999

8 papers in library cite

Hugo Larochelle, Yoshua Bengio, J. Louradour, P. Lamblin - 2009

7 papers in library cite

Kunihiko Fukushima, S. Miyake - 1982

7 papers in library cite

P. Berkes, L. Wiskott - 2005

3 papers in library cite

D. J. Felleman, D. C. V. Essen - 1991

2 papers in library cite

R. Q. Quiroga, L. Reddy, G. Kreiman, C. Koch, I. Fried - 2005

2 papers in library cite

L. Wiskott, T. Sejnowski - 2002

2 papers in library cite

Cited by

7

papers in your library

Cites

14

papers in your library

Read

on February 4, 2026

Your review

Tags

Paper Aliases

No aliases