2019
Cite Score
76
AI summary
This paper analyzes the financial and environmental costs of training various NLP models, finding that the cost of tuning a model for a new dataset can be extremely expensive. It recommends reporting training time and sensitivity to hyperparameters, as well as prioritizing computationally efficient hardware and algorithms.
Main Contributions
Abstract
Recent progress in hardware and methodology for training neural networks has ushered in a new generation of large networks trained on abundant data. These models have obtained notable gains in accuracy across many NLP tasks. However, these accuracy improvements depend on the availability of exceptionally large computational resources that necessitate similarly substantial energy consumption. As a result these models are costly to train and develop, both financially, due to the cost of hardware and electricity or cloud compute time, and environmentally, due to the carbon footprint required to fuel modern tensor processing hardware. In this paper we bring this issue to the attention of NLP researchers by quantifying the approximate financial and environmental costs of training a variety of recently successful neural network models for NLP. Based on these findings, we propose actionable recommendations to reduce costs and improve equity in NLP research and practice.
Citation Graph
References [19]
Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N. Gomez, Lukasz Kaiser, Illia Polosukhin - 2017
47 papers in library cite
Jacob Devlin, M. W. Chang, K. Lee, Kristina Toutanova - 2018
39 papers in library cite
D. Bahdanau, Kyunghyun Cho, Yoshua Bengio - 2014
59 papers in library cite
Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, Rewon Child, D. Luan, Dario Amodei, Ilya Sutskever - 2019
27 papers in library cite
M. E. Peters, M. Neumann, M. Iyyer, Matt Gardner, C. Clark, K. Lee, L. S. Zettlemoyer - 2018
27 papers in library cite
James Bergstra, Yoshua Bengio - 2012
7 papers in library cite
T. Luong, H. Pham, Christopher D. Manning - 2015
15 papers in library cite
J. Snoek, Hugo Larochelle, R. P. Adams - 2012
9 papers in library cite
J. S. Bergstra, R. Bardenet, Yoshua Bengio, B. Kegl - 2011
3 papers in library cite
A. Canziani, A. Paszke, E. Culurciello - 2017
2 papers in library cite
T. Dozat, Christopher D. Manning - 2017
2 papers in library cite
E. Strubell, P. Verga, D. Andor, D. Weiss, Andrew Mccallum - 2018
2 papers in library cite
C. Forster, T. Johnsen, S. Mandava, S. T. Sreenivas, D. Fu, J. Bernauer, A. Gray, S. Chetlur, Raul Puri - 2019
1 paper in library cites
G. Cook, Jaehoon Lee, T. Tsai, A. Kongn, J. Deans, B. Johnson, E. Jardim, B. Johnson - 2017
1 paper in library cites
Epa - 2018
1 paper in library cites
Dustin Li, X. Chen, M. Becchi, Z. Zong - 2016
1 paper in library cites
B. Burger - 2019
1 paper in library cites
D. R. So, C. Liang, Quoc V. Le - 2019
1 paper in library cites
R. Ascierto - 2018
1 paper in library cites
Cited by
3
papers in your library
Cites
7
papers in your library
Read
on November 23, 2025
Your review
Tags
Paper Aliases
No aliases