1995
Cite Score
36
AI summary
This paper compares the performance of several classifiers on a handwritten digit database, considering accuracy, rejection, training time, recognition time, and memory usage, finding that boosted LeNet 4 achieves 0.7% test error.
Main Contributions
Abstract
This paper compares the performance of several classifier algorithms on a standard database of handwritten digits. We consider not only raw accuracy, but also rejection, training time, recognition time, and memory requirements.
Citation Graph
References [11]
Yann Lecun, B. Boser, John S. Denker, D. Henderson, R. E. Howard, W. Hubbard, L. D. Jackel - 1990
10 papers in library cite
B. E. Boser, I. Guyon, V. N. Vapnik - 1992
3 papers in library cite
R. O. Duda, P. E. Hart - 1973
9 papers in library cite
Patrice Simard, Yann Lecun, John Denker - 1993
3 papers in library cite
I. Guyon, I. Poujaud, L. Personnaz, G. Dreyfus, John Denker, Yann Lecun - 1989
2 papers in library cite
J. Schurmann - 1978
1 paper in library cites
E. Sackinger, H. Graf - 1994
1 paper in library cites
H. Drucker, R. Schapire, Patrice Simard - 1993
1 paper in library cites
Y. Lee - 1991
1 paper in library cites
Leon Bottou, V. Vapnik - 1992
1 paper in library cites
C. Cortes, V. Vapnik - 1995
1 paper in library cites
Cited by
2
papers in your library
Cites
2
papers in your library
Read
on June 21, 2025
Your review
Tags
Paper Aliases
No aliases