1995

Comparison of Learning Algorithms for Handwritten Digit Recognition

V. Vapnik

citations

Cite Score

36

AI summary

This paper compares the performance of several classifiers on a handwritten digit database, considering accuracy, rejection, training time, recognition time, and memory usage, finding that boosted LeNet 4 achieves 0.7% test error.

Main Contributions

  • Compared various classification algorithms for handwritten digit recognition.
  • Evaluated algorithms based on accuracy, rejection rate, training time, recognition time, and memory requirements.
  • Introduced a database of handwritten digits for benchmarking.
  • Achieved a test error rate of 0.7% using a Boosted LeNet 4, the best performance among the tested classifiers.

Abstract

This paper compares the performance of several classifier algorithms on a standard database of handwritten digits. We consider not only raw accuracy, but also rejection, training time, recognition time, and memory requirements.

Citation Graph

Loading graph...

References [11]

Sort:
Filter:

Yann Lecun, B. Boser, John S. Denker, D. Henderson, R. E. Howard, W. Hubbard, L. D. Jackel - 1990

10 papers in library cite

B. E. Boser, I. Guyon, V. N. Vapnik - 1992

3 papers in library cite

R. O. Duda, P. E. Hart - 1973

9 papers in library cite

Patrice Simard, Yann Lecun, John Denker - 1993

3 papers in library cite

I. Guyon, I. Poujaud, L. Personnaz, G. Dreyfus, John Denker, Yann Lecun - 1989

2 papers in library cite

J. Schurmann - 1978

1 paper in library cites

E. Sackinger, H. Graf - 1994

1 paper in library cites

H. Drucker, R. Schapire, Patrice Simard - 1993

1 paper in library cites

Leon Bottou, V. Vapnik - 1992

1 paper in library cites

C. Cortes, V. Vapnik - 1995

1 paper in library cites

Cited by

2

papers in your library

Cites

2

papers in your library

Read

on June 21, 2025

Your review

Tags

Paper Aliases

No aliases